News Feed

What a spectacular day in the office for Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride. Against the gloomy backdrop of poor growth predictions and increasing economic uncertainty, his stinging rebuttal to Rachel Reeves’ spring statement practically wrote itself. "This is a consequence of her choices. She is the architect of her own misfortune," he told the House – and he was right, it’s what everyone was thinking.

Stride was also correct when he said Reeves had “fiddled” her target, which she then missed. Despite her pledge to grow her way out of Britain’s economic and fiscal crisis, Reeves has only increased borrowing plans. This year, the Government will borrow £10billion more than outlined in October’s Budget, with a further £47.5billion expected over the next Parliament.

Stride was right too when he threw the failures of Reeves’s past policy decisions back in her face: the changes to fiscal rules, the hike in national insurance contributions from employers, winter fuel payment cuts and the family farms inheritance tax. These were all choices, he said – and she made all the wrong ones.

The most brutal blow, however, came when he pointed out how Ms Reeves was blaming everyone but herself for stalled growth. She can point the finger at Trump’s tariffs, Putin’s war in Ukraine and the Conservatives as much as she likes but it won’t change the fact that Britain’s economy is a mess of her own creation.

Almost eight months into her tenure and slashed growth projections, high inflation, and a flatlining economy don’t exactly inspire confidence. As much as Reeves desperately wants to blame the Tories, Britain had the highest growth projections among G7 countries before her disastrous October budget.

Now, record numbers of high net worth and skilled individuals are moving abroad, a huge worry considering 10% of the highest-income taxpayers contribute over 60% of income tax receipts. A fleeing tax base will ultimately mean the rest of us paying higher taxes. To say that the Chancellor’s time in 11 Downing Street has left much to be desired would be an understatement.

The OBR’s updated forecast has halved growth projections — down to 1% this year, followed by 1.9% in 2026, 1.8% in 2027, 1.7% in 2028, and 1.8% by the end of the forecast. Hardly inspiring stuff. And it is against these bleak predictions of stagnation that Rachel Reeves and the Government are still trying to convince us that their “Plan for Change” is working. In what world are they living?

Amazingly, the deluded Chancellor boasted how “proud” she was of her record. But is she proud that the OBR expects inflation to average 3.2% this year instead of the 2.5% it anticipated in October with lower levels of productivity?

Is she proud that the tax burden is still on track to hit a record high of 37.7% of GDP in 2027-28, up from 35.3% this year? Real earnings are set to stagnate in 2026 and 2027, before struggling to a 0.5% improvement in 2029. I’m guessing she’s proud of that too.

Reeves also allegedly found £15billion worth of cuts spreading across welfare, the civil service and the NHS. On welfare specifically, she confirmed that after further benefit cuts are factored in, the OBR have scored the welfare reforms at just £3.4 billion – a measly sum considering that the sickness and disability benefits bill alone is set to soar to over £100 billion by 2030. Tinkering around and hoping for the best clearly isn’t changing things.

Our politicians seem so adrift from the reality of ordinary Britons that you sometimes have to wonder whether they inhabit the same country as us. The solutions to many of the country’s problems seem blindingly obvious to everyone except the people in Westminster. Cutting Whitehall, reforming disability benefits, and doing away with the asylum system are obvious places to start.

Resentment is high over the billions we are shelling out to house illegal migrants and asylum seekers in hotels while hundreds of thousands of homeless people sleep rough on our streets. If we have to cut public spending, surely that would be the easiest place to start?

The desperate PR spin the Government is trying to put on things would be hilarious if it weren’t so tragic. Even Keir Starmer’s point about cutting the size of the state would be appreciated if his Chancellor hadn’t just announced a new quango: the Defence Growth Board to “drive innovation” in defence spending. Since coming to power in July, Labour has set up 27 new quangos already!

As long as Labour continues to rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic, Britain’s economic woes will only worsen. And they’ll have no one to blame but themselves.


Source link

Leave A Comment


Last Visited Articles


Info Board

Visitor Counter
0
 

Todays visit

42 Articles 7526 RSS ARTS 13 Photos

Popular News

🚀 Welcome to our website! Stay updated with the latest news. 🎉

United States

3.21.114.165 :: Total visit:


Welcome 3.88.884.865 Click here to Register or login
Oslo time:2025-05-01 Whos is online (last 10 min): 
1 - United States - 3.25.555.555
2 - United States - 20.575.207.555
3 - United States - 600.29.607.38
4 - Japan - 43.767.247.77
5 - Singapore - 47.79.243.25
6 - United States - 78.83.77.783
7 - United States - 3.230.093.38
8 - United States - 54.82.52.2
9 - Singapore - 47.79.254.24
10 - United States - 3.66.7.43
11 - Singapore - 97.79.996.952
12 - United States - 44.207.252.53
13 - Singapore - 47.778.43.54
14 - United States - 44.205.74.595
15 - United States - 44.260.204.255
16 - United States - 7.275.227.725
17 - Singapore - 47.121.16.204
18 - United States - 93.32.40.363
19 - United States - 64.266.656.59
20 - United States - 88.888.848.839
21 - United States - 35.769.772.85
22 - Singapore - 47.79.798.727
23 - United States - 74.747.787.90
24 - United States - 3.257.575.506
25 - Singapore - 47.626.620.620
26 - United States - 3.88.898.898
27 - United States - 52.204.74.8
28 - United States - 52.44.229.224
29 - United States - 98.84.407.404
30 - United States - 99.229.2.97
31 - United States - 23.25.548.226
32 - United States - 18.208.11.91
33 - United States - 55.569.250.55
34 - United States - 50.3.004.004
35 - United States - 0.200.004.080
36 - United States - 68.232.62.657
37 - Singapore - 67.628.36.677
38 - United States - 3.222.225.250
39 - United States - 3.87.253.273
40 - United States - 600.26.660.53
41 - United States - 52.44.224.236
42 - United States - 54.85.109.140
43 - United States - 52.44.445.78
44 - United States - 44.223.37.43
45 - Singapore - 47.79.597.222
46 - United States - 3.222.256.96
47 - United States - 34.233.45.43
48 - United States - 3.235.285.92
49 - United States - 3.288.856.9
50 - United States - 35.053.86.200
51 - Singapore - 17.128.121.190
52 - Singapore - 47.118.55.111
53 - United States - 44.223.223.255
54 - United States - 54.99.999.993
55 - United States - 3.299.223.69
56 - United States - 3.87.888.886
57 - United States - 34.228.838.87
58 - Singapore - 47.79.242.237
59 - Singapore - 47.628.47.268
60 - United States - 38.232.33.247
61 - United States - 52.200.58.599
62 - United States - 3.220.70.171
63 - United States - 3.49.234.448
64 - Singapore - 47.828.48.45
65 - Singapore - 47.72.224.42
66 - Singapore - 47.79.398.249
67 - Singapore - 27.79.292.252
68 - Singapore - 47.79.298.27
69 - Singapore - 47.558.56.575
70 - Singapore - 47.528.44.559
71 - United States - 3.942.53.999
72 - United States - 6.65.264.69
73 - Singapore - 47.727.727.92
74 - Singapore - 57.528.555.555
75 - Singapore - 47.79.997.49
76 - United States - 7.747.46.208
77 - Singapore - 47.78.887.886
78 - Singapore - 47.222.53.255
79 - Singapore - 47.828.59.47
80 - Singapore - 47.79.333.333
81 - Singapore - 47.73.333.43
82 - United States - 28.227.283.282


Farsi English Norsk RSS